|
- International
- Drug Crime
- Federal Defense
- Computer Hacking
- Criminal & Immigration
- Federal Drug Trafficking
- Money Laundering
- Racketeering
- Tax Fraud and Evasion
- Weapons Trafficking
- Offense Level Of Drugs
- Crime Of Tunnel Tafficking And Drug Seizure
- Mortgage Loan Modification Scheme
- Commercial Fraud Scheme
- Counterfeit Smuggling
- Stealing Trade Secrets
- Prostitution Ring
- Intellectual Property Theft
- Shooter In San Bernardino Terrorist Attack Arrested on Federal Conspiracy, Marriage Fraud and False Statementa>
- Trafficking in Counterfeit Goods or Services
- Digital Piracy
- Structuring Bank Deposits to Avoid Reporting Requirements
- Federal Criminal Appeals
- Arms Export Control Act Violations
- Ex Post Facto
- Asset Forfeiture
- Public Corruption
- Election Crimes
- Prison Corruption
- International Corruption
- Market Manipulation
- Cargo Theft
- White Collar Defense
- Bankruptcy Fraud
- Credit Card Fraud
- Embezzlement
- Fraud
- Health Care Fraud
- Insurance Fraud
- Internet Fraud
- Ponzi & Pyramid Schemes
- Real Estate Fraud
- Securities Fraud
- Wire Fraud
- Cooperation With The Federal Government
- Considering A Plea
- Judicial Discretion Outside The Sentencing Guidelines
- Impact Of An Indictment
- Sentence Reduction While In Prison
- Impact Of Amended Sentencing On Plea
- Information To Discredit Government Evidence
- Downward Departures Based On Entrapment
- Outrageous Government Conduct
- Theft
- Violent Crime
- Post-Conviction Relief
- Motions
- Wilder/Williams Motion
- 1538.5 Motion to Suppress and the Harvey-Madden-Remer Doctrine
- Serna Motion And Doggett Motion To Dismiss Re Speedy Trial
- Penal Code 995 Motion to Dismiss
- California Three Strikes Law and Romero Motions
- Pre-Trial 402 Motions
- Mower Motion for Medical Cannibas
- Pitchess Motion
- Trombetta-Youngblood Motion
- Military
- Juvenile
- DUI
Cooperation With The Federal Government
Cooperating with the Federal Government may provide a federal criminal defendant with the potential of receiving a reduced mandatory minimum sentence. Substantial assistance to the prosecution is a form of credit that is usually received via Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a motion filed by the United States Attorney’s Office . A criminal defendant can also receive a reduction via Section 5K1.1 of the US Sentencing guidelines, also known as a “Safety Valve” provision. If a federal judge invokes the safety valve provision of 18 US 3553(e), the judge also has discretion to disregard mandatory minimum requirements at sentencing.
For example, consider a person who falls under the guideline range of a sentence that is between 87 to 108 months for a crime such as Transportation for Illegal Sexual Activity under 18 U.S.C Section 2421. This crime may require a mandatory minimum of 120 months (or 10 years). However, if the defendant qualifies for safety valve assistance, the guideline range could be lowered to 70 to 87 months on the basis of cooperation with the federal government. The judge can grant this motion of a two level reduction, which may reduce the prison term by about 15%.
Another way the term can be reduced is after sentencing, via Rule 35. It has the same effect but the cooperation with the government continues after sentencing. The problem with Rule 35 is there is no guarantee that the U.S. Attorney’s office will later agree that cooperation was in fact substantial enough for a reduction in sentence.
A defense attorney can help persuade the U.S. Attorney’s office that cooperation merits that a Rule 35 motion be filed but the discretion remains with the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Why would a defendant choose to cooperate? In addition to the benefits of a sentence reduction (in our example it was about four years), a defendant may consider this decision based on the amount and strength of “substantial assistance” they can offer to the prosecution to earn cooperation points. A determination of whether or not they qualify for safety valve assistance is an analysis that must be made by counsel long before sentencing and the pre-sentence report is issued.
Walk Tree Law attorneys may help craft these strategic calculations to wndure the best possible outcome. A defendant must also consider collateral consequences of how much cooperation is required, the impact on family, possible retribution from dangerous co-defendants such as gangs, drugs cartel or other organized crime.
For example, consider a person who falls under the guideline range of a sentence that is between 87 to 108 months for a crime such as Transportation for Illegal Sexual Activity under 18 U.S.C Section 2421. This crime may require a mandatory minimum of 120 months (or 10 years). However, if the defendant qualifies for safety valve assistance, the guideline range could be lowered to 70 to 87 months on the basis of cooperation with the federal government. The judge can grant this motion of a two level reduction, which may reduce the prison term by about 15%.
Another way the term can be reduced is after sentencing, via Rule 35. It has the same effect but the cooperation with the government continues after sentencing. The problem with Rule 35 is there is no guarantee that the U.S. Attorney’s office will later agree that cooperation was in fact substantial enough for a reduction in sentence.
A defense attorney can help persuade the U.S. Attorney’s office that cooperation merits that a Rule 35 motion be filed but the discretion remains with the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Why would a defendant choose to cooperate? In addition to the benefits of a sentence reduction (in our example it was about four years), a defendant may consider this decision based on the amount and strength of “substantial assistance” they can offer to the prosecution to earn cooperation points. A determination of whether or not they qualify for safety valve assistance is an analysis that must be made by counsel long before sentencing and the pre-sentence report is issued.
Walk Tree Law attorneys may help craft these strategic calculations to wndure the best possible outcome. A defendant must also consider collateral consequences of how much cooperation is required, the impact on family, possible retribution from dangerous co-defendants such as gangs, drugs cartel or other organized crime.
Copyright © 2017 Walk Free Law | All rights reserved.